
Last Wednesday, my dad took me to see the latest
Star Trek film. My dad has been a
Star Trek fan since the T.V. show aired in syndication. I've seen most of the films in theaters, but stopped after 1996's
Star Trek: First Contact because that film hit a home run with me. I didn't think it could ever be surpassed. Until now.
One thing I love about this new century is the trend towards "rebooting" famous film franchises that had run its course. First it was
Batman Begins, which I consider to be the most perfect comic book action hero film ever made. Finally, a director has managed to convey the best Batman comic book storylines for the big screen. I'll never forgive Joel Schumacher for turning Batman into a big, homoerotic joke (he was the guy who was obsessed with adding nipples to the Batsuit, after all, while adding too many characters and villains into absurd storylines).
Next came
Casino Royale, complete with a blond haired James Bond in a sort of origins story (it was the first Bond novel that Ian Fleming wrote). Not only did he not have his "00" status yet, we also learned about his family background and why he became so callous about women. Of course, with films like these, continuity between the new films and the older ones are basically non-existent. Literalist minded people might balk, but I love a good reinvention of an old story. It keeps things fresh.
Star Trek is certainly that! In fact, when I had read an interview with the director J.J. Abrams, he had mentioned being more of a
Star Wars fan than a
Star Trek fan. I'm that way as well. I've had debates with "Trekkies" (excuse me..."Trekkers") about which is better:
Wars or
Trek. For Trekkies,
Star Wars is too much of a space FANTASY. It's a fairy tale soap opera set in space. Though I like both and am familiar with both "universes",
Star Wars simply has more pizzaz to it. It's visually stunning, the hero's journey motif features prominently, and it's deeply spiritual.
Star Trek, on the other hand, was more cerebral and scientific. Spock is all logic, seen as the ideal. Though I have no idea if George Lucas was inspired by the
Star Trek television show in creating his own universe to populate with a vast array of creatures, Han Solo does seem to be a kind of Captain James T. Kirk. On the flip side, I noticed in
Star Trek V that there seemed to be a
Star Wars influence (the odd creatures on the planet Nimbus III reminded me of the Mos Eisley cantina on Tatooine).
The Force is definitely strong with the current
Trek. James Kirk was expelled to an icy planet and comes across a creature much like Luke Skywalker did on the planet Hoth in
Empire Strikes Back. There's even a bar scene early on in the film that seems ripped from the
Star Wars universe. This might have been intentional or perhaps subconscious, but the point is well taken. The
Star Wars films have a broader fan base, as each film easily crossed over at least $200 million mark at the box office. The
Star Trek films are lucky to limp to the $100 million mark, which the fourth installment (
The Voyage Home) did, making it the highest grossing
Trek film (until now).
Star Trek: The Motion Picture was released in 1979. No doubt, studios were jumping on the
Star Wars bandwagon, by turning to an old TV show and bringing it to the big screen in the ultra boring first film. All I remember is the bald chick. My dad made the mistake of bringing me to the film when I was a kid. I suppose he might've expected it to be like
Star Wars (which he knew I was a major fan of, thus taking me to see a Disney knock-off called
The Black Hole), but it was more like
2001: A Space Odyssey. Boring!
The funny thing about that first motion picture is that my cousin Anita (who was 18 at the time) was planning to see the film with a friend. I kind of had a crush on her and wanted to go see it with her and asked my dad if I could go with her. He said, "I thought you didn't like it." He was right, but I didn't care. I just wanted to go with Anita to the movies. Well...Anita happened to be with us for the wedding and I suggested that we go see it (30 years later and I'm still trying to relive that moment of childhood denial! Not that I still have a crush on her...I was only 7 at the time, after all). She wanted to, but didn't want to deal with the crowds and she flew back to Minnesota on Monday. So much for that.

When I first heard that Paramount Studios was rebooting the
Star Trek franchise for the next film rather than continue with the
Next Generation cast or bringing film versions of
Deep Space Nine or
Voyager to big budget proportions that you can only see in theaters, I believed it was a great idea. I got excited that it would be set at Fleet Academy and show audiences younger versions of the characters and how they came to meet. Thus, if there's only one flaw in the film, it's the skimming of Fleet Academy. I wanted to see more about their training, but it was not to be. That's okay, though, because the action was packed.
Time travel plays prominently in the film. Though some might bemoan the "lazy way" of story telling, I don't see it like that. The use of time travel was the only way they could bring Leonard Nimoy into the film as the older Spock. Did they need to have an original cast member in the film? Not really. My guess is that it was a way to claim legitimacy. And to appease fanatical fanboys who tend to go apeshit when a film doesn't live up to the hype or their imaginations. With Nimoy in the film, no one can claim that this film was made without the original cast's blessing. Besides, to transition between
Star Trek: The Undiscovered Country, which marked the original cast's final film, James T. Kirk made an appearance in
Star Trek: Generations, despite the centuries apart. So, don't fault a director for wanting to show some continuity and legitimacy.
What I really liked about this new
Trek is that we finally get to see the planet Vulcan and what Spock was like as a young man, struggling with his bi-racial identity (half-human, half-Vulcan). Emotions represent the human part of him, which he surpresses until someone makes a "your mother" joke. That's when we see Spock acting without logic.
Another scene in the film reminded me of
Empire Strikes Back (or
Attack of the Clones). When Kirk and Sulu are fighting Romulans on a platform hovering above the landscape on Vulcan, I thought of Luke Skywalker hanging on for dear life at the bottom of Cloud City or Obi-Wan Kenobi fighting Jango Fett on a platform suspended over water on the planet of Kamino.
The new Spock has an uncanny resemblance to Nimoy's Spock. He's the only castmember who really looks like a member of the original. Chris Pine as James Kirk seems to have been hired mostly for an ability to attract females into theaters to see this film because God knows we don't have enough female Trekkies. Kumar might have went to the White House to work, but it looks like his comedic partner Harold is making a new name for himself as a younger version of Sulu. There's never a White Castle when you need one!
After the film finished, I was impressed. Finally, a director did something right. I definitely want to see this film in theaters again. Since there are very few movies I want to see this summer, I'll probably watch this film. The confusing plot merits such an indulgence. Nero, a renegade Romulan with a cockroach-looking spaceship, goes back in time to destroy the planet Vulcan (again, reminiscent of the Death Star's destruction of another peaceful planet of Alderaan) in retaliation for what he feels was Spock's broken promise to save his planet. I'm still not clear on the motives. Eric Bana was barely recognizable in his role as Nero.
With a young cast, I forsee a long series of new films though I don't understand why they'd want to. It just seems to me that they have explored everything already so there's not much new to center a story around. This Trek beats all the others. Its worth seeing more than once. In a summer of bland movies, Star Trek might show remarkable continuity of business. The Force is definitely strong with this one.